Another Woman With Dirt on the Clintons Dies in “Freak Accident”

0
3
views

Another dead body turned up this week, and while we must make it clear that we are not blaming the Clintons for the death of this woman, we have to say there are some interesting connections between the deceased and the Clinton family.

I find it very interesting that so many people with dirt on the Clintons have been found dead over the years. The mysterious trail of dead bodies does leave us wondering if there is more to the story. Is it possible that Hillary Clinton is prepared to do anything to keep her family’s secrets kept hidden? The most recent death was that of a woman who was recently discovered to have photos that would expose the Clintons

The story was originally reported as an unfortunate house fire, but there is a lot more to the story than we are being told. Prior to the death of this woman, she was allegedly a victim to one of Bill Clinton’s biggest secrets. Was this woman’s death a tool to cover up evidence against the Clintons?

The Daily Mail reported on the matter. They explained that while more women come forward to share their stories about both consensual and forced sexual encounters will former President Bill Clinton, there is one woman who is no longer around to give details about her alleged affair.

Penthouse Pet and beauty Judi Gibbs perished in a mysterious house fire in 1986. This horrific fire took place right after rumors began circulating that she had photos to prove that she and Bill Clinton had been having a sexual relationship.  Here we are, thirty years after Gibbs’s death, and there are still doubts about just how and why Gibbs and her long-time sweetheart Bill Puterbaugh died.

DailyMail.com has put together a composite of the life and death of Judi Gibbs. They have explained for the first time how the woman from a small town in Arkansas managed to form a sexual relationship with a man who managed to become one of the most powerful men in modern day times. People questioned if Gibbs was killed in order to keep the affair between herself and Clinton quiet, but the question was never answered.

Martha, Gibbs’s older sister who still resides in Sims, Arkansas, explained to DailyMail.com, “I have always been convinced that Bill Clinton was responsible for the fire, but I have no proof. And what would happen if I had proof- you can’t touch those people.”

Gibbs was 32 when she died. She had been living with her lover, 57-year-old Puterbaugh in a large home which was a quarter of a mile drive to a small airport just outside of Fordyce, Arkansas. The bodies of both Puterbaugh and Gibbs were found in the large master bedroom. Both had died of smoke inhalation.

Randy, Puterbaugh’s son, explained his own story of the account, which was eerily similar to Martha Gibbs’s. The two have no spoken since the days following the deaths of their loved ones.

Randy Puterbaugh explained, “There are so many pieces of the puzzle. I believe it is a possibility that Bill Clinton was involved in their deaths. I know I wish I had hired my own private investigator but I didn’t, so I guess I will never know.”

It’s hard for people to think anything other than foul play when so many people with connections to the Clintons keep winding up dead of “mysterious circumstances.” Can it really just be coincidence? It’s time that we start taking a better look at all of these cases side by side. Why do Democrats insist on ignoring these “coincidences” time and time again? Why are people protecting the Clintons?

Earlier this year Daily Mail reported that five deaths within a six week span between the dates of June 22 and August 2 had connections to the Clinton family.

Larry Nichols worked with the Clintons before he turned against them. He explained, “I’m not saying the Clintons kill people. I’m saying a lot of people around the Clintons turn up dead.”

Why is it that among all of the Hollywood elite and politicians who are being called out for sexual misconduct, no one has called out Bill Clinton? Why is it that anyone else who commits these kinds of crimes are considered criminals, but when Bill Clinton sexually abuses a woman he is considered a ladies’ man? It’s time that we start questioning everything, because the cards are stacked against the Clintons at this point. They cannot hide much longer.

Comments

comments